Traditional CDPs were built for B2C—tracking anonymous visitors, building consumer segments, and powering marketing automation. B2B companies adopted them but often struggle with account-centric use cases, complex buying committees, and the need for sales and marketing alignment.
The composable CDP offers an alternative: use your data warehouse as the foundation and compose capabilities from best-of-breed tools. This approach gives you the flexibility B2B requires without the constraints of monolithic CDP platforms.
Traditional CDP vs. Composable CDP #
Traditional CDP Architecture
flowchart LR
Sources --> CDP[CDP Platform] --> Destinations
CDP --- Note[All logic lives inside the CDP]
Characteristics
- Vendor owns your customer data
- Limited customization
- Pre-built identity resolution
- Closed ecosystem
Composable CDP Architecture
flowchart LR
Sources --> DW[Data Warehouse] --> AL[Activation Layer] --> Destinations
DW --- Note1[You own the data<br/>Full customization]
AL --- Note2[Flexible tools<br/>Best of breed]
Characteristics
- You own your data
- Full customization
- Build your own identity logic
- Open ecosystem
Why Composable for B2B #
B2B-Specific Requirements
| Requirement | Traditional CDP | Composable CDP |
|---|---|---|
| Account-centric | Often weak | Native SQL |
| Buying committees | Limited | Full flexibility |
| Product usage | Basic | Full integration |
| Sales alignment | Marketing focus | Unified |
| Custom scoring | Rigid | Unlimited |
| Data ownership | Vendor | You |
Composable Advantages
Flexibility Build exactly what you need, not what the vendor provides.
Cost Efficiency Pay for warehouse storage (cheap) not CDP licensing (expensive).
Data Ownership Your data never leaves your control.
Best-of-Breed Choose the best tool for each job.
Building Your Composable CDP #
Architecture Components
flowchart TB
subgraph Sources[DATA SOURCES]
CRM1[CRM]
Marketing1[Marketing]
Product1[Product]
Enrichment1[Enrichment]
Intent1[Intent]
Web1[Web]
end
subgraph Ingestion[INGESTION LAYER]
Tools[Fivetran, Airbyte, Segment]
end
subgraph Warehouse[DATA WAREHOUSE - Snowflake, BigQuery]
Raw[Raw Data]
Staging[Staging]
Identity[Identity]
Unified[Unified Profiles]
end
subgraph Activation[ACTIVATION LAYER]
ReverseETL[Reverse ETL, Orchestration: Cargo]
end
Sources --> Ingestion
Ingestion --> Warehouse
Warehouse --> Activation
Activation --> CRM2[CRM]
Activation --> Marketing2[Marketing]
Activation --> Ads[Ads]
Component Selection
Ingestion Layer
| Tool | Type | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Fivetran | Managed ETL | Ease of use |
| Airbyte | Open source ETL | Cost control |
| Segment | Event streaming | Product events |
| Rudderstack | Open source CDP | Privacy |
Storage Layer
| Tool | Strength |
|---|---|
| Snowflake | Performance, ecosystem |
| BigQuery | Serverless, cost |
| Databricks | ML capabilities |
Transformation Layer
| Tool | Approach |
|---|---|
| dbt | SQL-based, version controlled |
| Dataform | Google-native |
| Custom | Full control |
Activation Layer
| Tool | Strength |
|---|---|
| Census | Broad connectors |
| Hightouch | User-friendly |
| Cargo | Revenue-focused |
B2B Data Models #
Account-Centric Model
-- Unified Account Profile
CREATE TABLE unified_accounts AS
SELECT
-- Identity
account_id,
domain,
company_name,
-- Firmographics (from enrichment)
industry,
employee_count,
annual_revenue,
funding_stage,
-- Technographics (from BuiltWith, etc.)
tech_stack,
crm_used,
marketing_automation,
-- Engagement (aggregated)
total_engagement_score,
last_engagement_date,
web_visits_30d,
email_opens_30d,
-- Product (from product analytics)
is_active_user,
monthly_active_users,
feature_adoption_score,
-- Intent (from intent providers)
intent_score,
intent_topics,
intent_trend,
-- Revenue (from CRM)
pipeline_value,
closed_won_revenue,
arr,
-- Scoring (calculated)
icp_fit_score,
pql_score,
health_score,
-- Segmentation
account_tier,
target_segment,
territory
FROM account_master
JOIN enrichment ON ...
JOIN product_usage ON ...
JOIN intent_data ON ...
JOIN crm_data ON ...;
Contact-Centric Model
-- Unified Contact Profile
CREATE TABLE unified_contacts AS
SELECT
contact_id,
account_id,
email,
name,
-- Role
title,
department,
seniority,
persona,
buying_role,
-- Engagement
engagement_score,
last_activity_date,
preferred_channel,
-- Activity
emails_opened_30d,
content_downloaded,
meetings_attended,
-- Product
is_product_user,
last_login,
feature_usage
FROM contact_master
JOIN engagement_data ON ...
JOIN product_usage ON ...;
Identity Resolution
Build your own matching logic:
-- Account Identity Resolution
CREATE TABLE identity_graph AS
WITH matches AS (
SELECT
a.source_id,
b.source_id AS matched_id,
CASE
WHEN a.domain = b.domain THEN 'exact_domain'
WHEN similarity(a.name, b.name) > 0.9
AND a.city = b.city THEN 'fuzzy_name_city'
-- More rules...
END AS match_type
FROM source_accounts a
CROSS JOIN source_accounts b
WHERE a.source_id < b.source_id
AND (a.domain = b.domain
OR similarity(a.name, b.name) > 0.9)
)
SELECT
generate_unified_id() AS unified_account_id,
source_id,
match_type
FROM matches;
Activation Patterns #
Pattern 1: Score Sync
Source: account_scores (warehouse)
Destination: Salesforce
Sync:
- icp_score → ICP_Score__c
- engagement_score → Engagement_Score__c
- account_tier → Account_Tier__c
Frequency: Every 4 hours
Pattern 2: Audience Sync
Source: target_accounts_tier1 (warehouse)
Destination: LinkedIn Ads
Sync:
- company_name
- domain
- linkedin_company_id
Frequency: Daily
Pattern 3: Alert Triggers
Source: high_intent_accounts (warehouse view)
Destination: Slack + Salesforce Task
Trigger: When new accounts appear in view
Action: Alert sales, create follow-up task
Composable CDP with Cargo #
Cargo serves as the activation and orchestration layer:
Direct Warehouse Connection
Workflow: Warehouse-Powered Scoring
Source: Snowflake/BigQuery
Query:
SELECT account_id, score, tier
FROM ml_models.account_scores
WHERE score_date = CURRENT_DATE
→ Sync to Salesforce
→ Sync to HubSpot
→ Trigger workflows based on score changes
Real-Time Enrichment
Workflow: Enrich and Store
Trigger: New account identified
→ Enrich from multiple providers
→ Store in warehouse (append)
→ Calculate scores
→ Sync to operational systems
Multi-System Activation
Workflow: Unified Activation
Source: Warehouse unified profiles
→ CRM: Update accounts and contacts
→ Marketing: Update segments
→ Ads: Sync audiences
→ Sales engagement: Update attributes
All from single source of truth.
Implementation Roadmap #
Month 1: Foundation
- Set up warehouse
- Implement ingestion for core sources
- Build basic staging models
Month 2: Identity & Unification
- Build identity resolution
- Create unified account model
- Create unified contact model
Month 3: Activation
- Implement reverse ETL
- Sync scores to CRM
- Sync audiences to ads
Month 4: Optimization
- Add more sources
- Refine models
- Expand activation use cases
Best Practices #
- Start with use cases - Build for specific needs, not theoretical completeness
- Own your identity - Build your own resolution logic
- Document everything - Future you will thank present you
- Monitor data quality - Garbage in, garbage out
- Plan for growth - Design for 10x your current scale
The composable CDP gives B2B companies the flexibility to build customer data infrastructure that truly fits their needs—account-centric, sales-aligned, and fully customizable.
Ready to build your composable CDP? Cargo provides the activation layer to turn your warehouse data into operational intelligence.
Key Takeaways #
- Traditional CDPs were built for B2C: they struggle with account-centric use cases, buying committees, and sales alignment that B2B requires
- Composable CDP = warehouse as foundation: sources → ingestion → data warehouse → activation layer → destinations—you own the data
- Cost efficiency: pay for warehouse storage (cheap) instead of CDP licensing (expensive)—often 50-80% savings
- Build your own identity resolution: match accounts by domain and fuzzy name, contacts by email and domain+name—full control over logic
- 4-month implementation roadmap: foundation (month 1) → identity/unification (month 2) → activation (month 3) → optimization (month 4)