Both say GTM as code.Cargo ships the whole engine.
A GTM system of record, enrichment, scoring, routing, territories and agents in one TypeScript project, planned as a diff and built by your coding agent.
The difference
Same words.Different depth.
Deepline is the closest competitor on language. The difference is what sits under it.
Described as
Described as
GTM as code
GTM as code
Data layer
Data layer
Postgres provisioned in the workspace
A system of record built for billions of records
Pricing
Pricing
Priced per endpoint
One credit balance: enrichment, orchestration, storage
Best when
Best when
The job is calling enrichment endpoints
The job is the whole revenue engine
In short. Use Deepline if you are buying endpoints on price. Use Cargo when data, scoring, routing and agents have to be defined together.
Built for GTM
What GTM as code has to cover
Run these checks on anything you evaluate.
Files in a repo you own
Models, plays, territories and agents in TypeScript, next to the rest of your code.
Planned as a diff
Every change is previewed as a plan and reviewed before it deploys.
Traced on every run
Each run leaves a log you can inspect step by step.
Built by coding agents
Claude Code, Cursor or Codex build and change the engine over the CLI and MCP. Every change is a diff.
One system of record
Built for the full GTM dataset, with SQL throughout.
Retries and rate limits
Handled per step, so the engine holds when a provider does not.
Choosing
When to choose which
Both products have a real job. The decision is which job you are hiring for.
Choose Deepline when…
Choose Cargo when…
Both true. The phrase is shared, so check what each one covers in a trial. Pick the one that covers your engine.
Cargo vs Deepline, in short
“Essential. Innovative. Indispensable. Cargo let you build your unique growth engine, a much-needed solution in the market today.”Guillaume Cabane
Co-Founder @Hypergrowth
Give your agents a runtime
Bring the agents you have.Start free, deploy in one command.