Revenue logic the GTM team owns
Tray.io is an enterprise automation and integration platform. Cargo is GTM orchestration: the data model, scoring, routing and agents, declared in code you own.
Trusted by GTM teams at
Tray.io integrates the business. Cargo runs the revenue engine.
On an iPaaS, every GTM concept is assembled out of generic steps and then maintained.
| Cargo | ||
|---|---|---|
| Built for | Integration across the business | The revenue engine |
| Owned by | IT or central ops | The GTM team |
| GTM semantics | Assembled out of generic steps | Data model, waterfalls, scoring, routing and territories |
| GTM as code | Workflows built in Tray's visual builder | The workspace in TypeScript, in your git repo |
| Best when | The mandate is integration across systems | The mandate is revenue |
In short. Tray.io keeps the integration estate; Cargo owns the revenue logic that decides what to do with what those integrations deliver.
What an iPaaS leaves you to assemble
On an integration platform each of these is built from generic steps.
One GTM data model
Accounts, contacts, deals and custom objects every play reads.
CompaniesAll recordsFilterSort12,480 records6/24 columnsName+23
DomainEmployeesCountryIndustryICP fitAdd columnNorthwindnorthwind.com420United StatesLogistics82Contosocontoso.com1,200FranceSoftware74Globexglobex.com3,400GermanyManufacturing91Initechinitech.com260United StatesSoftware68Fabrikamfabrikam.com880FranceRetail55Umbrellaumbrella.com2,100United KingdomHealthcare79Stark Logisticsstarklogistics.com640United StatesLogistics88Wayne Freightwaynefreight.com1,450SpainLogistics71Enrichment waterfalls
Providers in a waterfall, with retries and rate limits handled.
EnabledEnrich inbound leadsSearch...4/4 nodesFilter5/5 statusesAll versionsAll batchesAll datesStartstart
Find emailfind_email
Enrich companyenrich_company
ICP fitscore_icpAda Lovelaceada@northwind.com
Northwind, 420 employees
82/100Grace Hoppergrace@contoso.com
Contoso, 1,200 employees
74/100Alan TuringNo email found, 0 credits
Globex, 3,400 employees
91/100Katherine Johnsonkatherine@initech.com
Running...DefaultFiles in a repo you own
Models, plays, territories and agents in TypeScript.
- plan
- context
- initiatives
- cadence
- infra
- context.ts
- tam-building
- account-scoring
- evals
- outputs
- AGENTS.md
- cargo.state.json
Scoring on your ICP
Each account gets a fit score and a readiness score from signals.
EnabledRoute inbound leadsSearch...2/2 nodesFilter5/5 statusesAll versionsAll batchesAll datesStartstart
ICP fitscore_icpAda Lovelace82/100Grace Hopper74/100Alan Turing91/100Katherine Johnson68/100Edsger Dijkstra55/100Mary Jackson77/100Claude Shannon86/100Barbara Liskov63/100DefaultRouting that knows the org
Territory, capacity, ownership and fallback, not tied to one CRM.
Revenue organizationNew territoryNew capacityMembersTerritoriesCapacitiesA group of members that shares incoming records. Weights and a fallback decide who is next.
Territories3 territoriesUnited StatesInbound from North AmericaFranceInbound from FranceEMEAEverything else in EuropeUnited StatesLabel*United StatesChoose a label to your territory
Color*Choose a color to represent your territory
DescriptionInbound from North AmericaChoose a description
Members*AMAlice Martin50SOSam Okoro50Add memberPick members you want to be part of your territory
Fallback MemberDCDana ColeThe member that will be used when other territory members are not available (e.g. Capacity reached).
SaveBuilt by coding agents
Your coding agent changes it as diffs, over the CLI or MCP.
Account researcherDeployInstructionsResearch the account, score it against our ICP and write a two-line brief for the owner. Use our ICP definition from context, not your own.ActionsEnrich companyenrich_company
Search the webweb_search
Get companyhubspot_get_company
The building blocks of the agent. They are the actions the agent can take. The agent will use the actions to achieve the goal.
Advanced settingsClaude Sonnet 5
Research Northwind and tell me if it fits our ICP.Reasoned for a few secondsGet company0
Enrich company1
Search the web2
Northwind fits: 82/100. 420 employees, logistics, and two open SDR roles, which is the growth trigger in your ICP.
It sits in the United States territory, so the owner is Alice Martin. Lead with routing: their HubSpot assigns inbound by hand today.
Ask agent...
GTM as code, in your repo.
Your whole Cargo workspace is TypeScript in git: every change reviewed, planned and reversible.
- In your repoThe whole workspace, declared in TypeScript.
- Planned on every pull request
cargo-ai project planshows the diff. Merging deploys it. - Undone with git revertRevert the commit and the previous version deploys.
Written by your coding agent: Claude Code, Cursor or Codex.
import { defineMember, defineTerritory } from "@cargo-ai/cdk";const alice = defineMember("alice@acme.com");const dana = defineMember("dana@acme.com");// United States accounts go to Alice, Dana coversexport const unitedStates = defineTerritory("united-states", {label: "United States",members: [{ ref: alice, weight: 1 }],fallback: dana,});
When to choose which
Both products have a real job. The decision is which job you are hiring for.
- The mandate is integration across the business
- IT or central ops owns the platform
- Many systems need general-purpose workflows
- Enterprise governance across those systems decides it
- The mandate is revenue
- The GTM team should own its own logic
- Data model, scoring and routing should be built in
- Coding agents should build and change the engine
Both true. Tray.io is the better integration platform. Cargo is the better GTM engine. Tray.io keeps the integration estate, and Cargo owns the revenue logic that decides what to do with what it delivers.
Cargo vs Tray.io, in short
“Essential. Innovative. Indispensable. Cargo let you build your unique growth engine, a much-needed solution in the market today.”
Guillaume Cabane · Co-Founder @HypergrowthBuild the self-driving GTM engine
Your coding agents build it on Cargo.Or our team builds, operates and improves it with you.

