Score leads
Score a list of companies against your ideal customer profile and rank them — every row gets a number, the reason behind it, and a tier, so the bottom of the list can be dropped before anyone spends time on it.
Install score-leads and follow its SKILL.md, starting from https://api.getcargo.io/INSTALL.md$npx skills add getcargohq/gtm-skills/score-leadsNo account needed to install. A new Cargo account starts with 100 free credits, no card.
Say this to your agent
Score the 20 companies in `webinar-accounts.csv` against our ICP: 50–500 employees, B2B software, US or UK, competitors out.
Illustrative output #
Fictional records, to show the shape of what comes back.
| domain | score | tier | reason | missing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| northwind.example | 92 | A | 240 staff, B2B software, US | |
| tailspin.example | 61 | B | B2B software, UK; 85 staff is small but inside range | |
| globex.example | 0 | — | disqualified: competitor | |
| umbrella.example | unranked | headcount, industry |
20 enriched for 5 credits (20 × 0.25): 4 tier A, 8 tier B, 5 tier C, 1 disqualified, 2 unranked for missing data.
What it costs #
| Action | Credits |
|---|---|
companyEnrich.enrichByDomain | 0.25 |
Never run this across a full list on the first attempt. Sample 10–20 rows, report the observed cost and the score distribution, then get the user to approve the full run — quoting the record count and the credit estimate. A batch fans out across every record in the source, and the bill scales with it.
Show the distribution with the sample, not just the cost. If every row lands in one tier the criteria are not discriminating, and that is worth finding out at 20 rows rather than at 2,000.
Worth knowing #
enrichByDomainneeds a domain, not a company name. A list carrying only names has to be resolved first, and that is a different job: say so rather than sending names and reporting the misses as bad fits.- Scoring is deterministic and free. Keep it that way: an LLM asked to “rate fit” produces a number nobody can reproduce or argue with.
- Re-scoring after the criteria change costs nothing, because the enrichment is already stored. Say so, because users assume otherwise and under-ask as a result.
- Richer firmographics exist at a higher tier if a criterion genuinely needs them. Reach for one only when a stated criterion cannot be answered from the fields above, never by default.